I think it’s doable. I’d give yourselves a good four days in Paris, London, and Rome, and no more than two in Venice. Flying often is cheaper, but it’s not the best idea unless you’re covering a really long distance. I’d definitely use trains within Italy, between Paris and Amsterdam, and between Paris and London (take advantage of specials on the Eurostar trains and it’s reasonably priced, and goes from city center to city center, unlike flying). Most people here would tell you to skip the tours. I looked briefly at some of the Top Deck offerings and the pace is ridiculous – 1.5 days each for Paris, Barcelona, Florence and Rome, etc.? I hope all their tours aren’t like that. Your trip is easily, and probably much more enjoyably, done on your own.

Hi augustin25! Thank you for your reply.
Yeah I would definately look at specials! Thanks.
Even tho I knew it was crazy I was kind of tempted by Topdecks tours since they cover alot a ground in such a short time. But you’re probably right in saying that we’ll enjoy it alot more going at our own pace.

My general Itinerary idea is-
Rome-3 1/2days
Florence-2 1/2days
Venice-2 1/2days
Prague-2 1/2days
Amsterdam-3 1/2days
Paris-4 1/2days
London-4 1/2days

Which will take roughly 24days (if my maths is right), which gives us enough time to travel from here and back within the 4 weeks.
I hope it’s not going to be too rushed but looks like it might be…haha…

Seems pretty good, that’s not too rushed.

If it were me I’d give Venice 1 1/2 days and add to Prague. Wife & I dedicated a good solid 10 hour day to walk around Venice and that was enough to see it all…and Prague was our favourite city on the trip. Packed with charm.

Rome is definitely a 3+ day city, Amsterdam is probably at its limit with 3 1/2 days, IMO.

Looks like a great trip, have fun.