- Forums
- Eurotrips
- Map
- Rail Passes
- Eurail Global Pass
- Eurail Select Pass
- Eurail Regional Pass
- Eurail Austria-Czech Republic Pass
- Eurail Austria-Germany Pass
- Eurail Austria-Hungary Pass
- Eurail Austria-Slovenia/Croatia Pass
- Eurail Austria-Switzerland Pass
- Eurail Benelux-France Pass
- Eurail Benelux-Germany Pass
- Eurail Benelux Pass
- Eurail Czech Republic-Germany Pass
- Eurail Denmark-Germany Pass
- Eurail France-Germany Pass
- Eurail France-Italy Pass
- Eurail France-Spain Pass
- Eurail France-Switzerland Pass
- Eurail Germany-Poland Pass
- Eurail Germany-Switzerland Pass
- Eurail Greece-Italy Pass
- Eurail Hungary-Croatia/Slovenia Pass
- Eurail Hungary-Romania Pass
- Eurail Italy-Spain Pass
- Eurail Portugal-Spain Pass
- Eurail Scandinavia Pass
- Eurail One Country Pass
- Eurail Austria Pass
- Eurail Bulgaria Pass
- Eurail Croatia Pass
- Eurail Czech Republic Pass
- Eurail Denmark Pass
- Eurail Finland Pass
- Eurail Greece Pass
- Eurail Hungary Pass
- Eurail Ireland Pass
- Eurail Italy Pass
- Eurail Norway Pass
- Eurail Poland Pass
- Eurail Portugal Pass
- Eurail Romania Pass
- Eurail Slovenia Pass
- Eurail Spain Pass
- Eurail Sweden Pass
- Booking
- Travel Tips
- Links
- Podcasts
Which Belgian City?
Tue, 08/15/2006 - 15:03
My friend and I are deciding between spending more time in Bruges or Brussels. Can anyone that has been to both suggest if I can only visit one of Bruges or Brussels, which would be the better choice? and why?

There is no question, anyone will tell you to spend your time in Brugges. Brussels only needs a day (and not even a full one).
yeah brugges, although i wasnt overly fussed on it but it is better than brussels which is worth a night if you have time but not something to go out of your way for. Brussels is just another (quite small) capital city, brugges is a small ye olde kinda town, nice for a day aswell. enjoy.
I would agree with the previous two postings. However, Conde Nast Traveler just recently (June 06, I think) did an extensive article on Brussels. They were particularly impressed with the recent renovations to Brussels hotels, restaurants, clubs, etc.
MunichBeerBoy
Thanks Everyone, you’ve all been very helpful
As a rule of thumb, leisure-minded travel magazines do not embed subtle political messages or admonitions, disguised as promotional fluff, intended to antagonize foreign government and industry officials. That is typically reserved for more serious political, economic or legal journals or newspaper editorials. Why then, has the Conde Nast Traveler done just that, in a recent article about Brussels, Belgium?
for an interesting article on this subject matter, entitled, "Beware of the ‘Flying Dutchman’ When Traveling to Brussels", please see:
http://www.itssd.org…